SOTR1949 - Secrets of the Third Reich

 
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • Increase font size
Home
World War II Infantry Assault Tactics PDF Print E-mail
Written by Michael Cannon   
Sunday, 02 November 2008

World War II Infantry Assault Tactics is one of the latest Osprey Elite series books. The author, Rottman, is a veteran who entered service in 1967 (a year before the Tet Offensive) and served in Vietnam in the 5th Special Forces Group. He also worked for the Army at the Readiness Training Center as a scenario writer. His resume indicates that he is well grounded in what he is talking about in this book and his experience comes through. In many places, the book reads similar to a Field Manual and I found myself transported back in my mind to Army classes as a junior officer listening to people describe tactical scenarios in detail.

 

Here's one example:

"Though they perform myriad other tasks, the close assault of an enemy-occupied objective is the central job of the rifle platoon – to `close with and destroy or capture the enemy by fire and manoeuvre'. No matter how well equipped and trained beforehand, units had to be flexible enough to adapt their tactics and weapons employment to respond to the enemy's techniques, weapons, obstacles and fortifications (as well as to the terrain, vegetation and weather)."

The book contains the following sections:
  • Introduction to the Rifle Platoon
  • The Objective
  • Breaching Obstacles
  • Demolition Materials
  • Assault Tactics Applied
  • Notes on National Practice


Descriptions of procedures and items (such as pole-charges) is necessarily brief in a book of this length but Rottman does a good job in covering the field. There are snapshots of doctrines from each of the major powers.

tn_demo.jpg Although Rottman was described as a weapons specialist, I'd be willing to bet he also was a demolitions expert as seven pages of the sixty-three available describe explosives and demolitions in use by the major powers in tendentious detail. This is the only quibble I have with the book. I think the pages devoted to this would have been better used to describe historical examples of the doctrine he presents.

His descriptions of what soldiers faced in assaulting prepared positions is right on the mark. Take this as an example:

"The preferred method of breaching wire was demolitions. Attaching individual charges to stakes was too time-consuming and difficult, and simply throwing in large satchel charges was only marginally effective. To destroy dense barriers with artillery and heavy mortars required the infantry to be pulled well back for safety, a high degree of accuracy, and heavy expenditure of ammunition that could be better spent on higher-value targets. Artillery also created craters and a tangle of chopped-up wire and uprooted stakes that were still difficult for infantry to negotiate.

tn_obstacles.jpg tn_sketches.jpgThe `bangalore torpedo' was the wire-breaching charge of choice; typically, these were light-gauge steel tubes 4ft-6ft long and 1 1/2 in-2in in diameter, filled with 1 1/2 lb-21b of explosive per foot of length. A number of tubes could be linked together end-to-end into a string by means of locking collars...."

There are numerous diagrams scattered throughout the book that show how defensive positions were designed as well as accompanying sketches as to how these positions could be overcome. The majority of the techniques he discusses could apply to both deliberate and hasty assaults.

The book does not add much new to discussions on tactics at this level but it puts the major powers' concepts into one place and so makes a good book for beginners and a passable reference for oldsters.

 

Comments
Add NewSearch
Only registered users can write comments!

Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved.

Last Updated ( Saturday, 27 December 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >

SOTR1949 Login

Magazine Issues

Issue 3
Issue 2
Issue 1

Featured Article

US Armored Infantry
US Armored Infantry
Back in the late 70s or early 80s, Duke Seifried evangelized the use of washes in painting miniatures. Once again he was ahead of his time. Lately, Dr. Phil Hendry has been doing something similar for Warlord Games with his use of Army Painter products and dipping. Now back in Texas there are really only two kinds of dip - one for sheep and one for the lower lip. I liked Phil's results, however, and decided to give it a shot with my US Armored infantry platoon.
Read More >>

Syndicate

Who's Online

We have 2 guests online